Joseph R. Maridon, Jr., Esq. graduated from the William S. Boyd School of Law at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas in 2003. Since then he has worked primarily as a civil litigator on cases ranging from simple auto accidents with minor injuries to multi-million dollar auto, truck and aviation cases involving catastrophic injury or wrongful death.

Website URL: https://www.maridonlaw.com/attorneys/joseph-r-maridon-jr-esq Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

For over a year, a concerning scene has unfolded in our courtrooms. Traffic violations, those seemingly minor bumps on the road of daily life, have become warped into a twisted landscape where fairness buckles under the weight of a dereliction of duty and the court grapples with an unlawful burden. The culprit? District Attorney Steve Wolfson's inexplicable refusal to prosecute these public offenses, leaving a dangerous void in the pursuit of justice.

Duty Abandoned, Justice Adrift:

The district attorney's mandate is etched in stone: to represent the people in the pursuit of justice and prosecute all public offenses. Traffic violations, regardless of their perceived triviality, fall squarely under this sacred oath. Yet, for over a year, the district attorney, Steve Wolfson, has chosen to turn a blind eye, abandoning his duty and leaving a gaping hole in the legal fabric. This isn't simply an oversight; it's a brazen disregard for the law and a betrayal of the public trust. In his absence, justice stumbles, leaving individuals vulnerable and the scales of fairness permanently tilted.

Unlevel Playing Field, Unfair Outcomes:

Traffic court often presents a lopsided battleground. Defendants, often lacking legal counsel, face off against trained police officers wielding the state's case. The district attorney's role, with his legal expertise and commitment to due process, is to level this playing field. He ensures both sides are heard, safeguards defendants' rights against potential bias, and upholds the principle of equal justice for all. In his absence, individuals stand alone, potentially victim to unfair outcomes and a system devoid of balance.

Misconduct Untamed, Safety Unbalanced:

Police officers, though vital to public safety, are not immune to error or misconduct. Without the district attorney acting as an independent investigator and prosecutor, complaints against officers accused of unfair ticketing practices or harassment could languish unheard. His involvement deters potential abuse, ensures officers operate within the bounds of the law, and safeguards individual rights. By shirking this responsibility, the district attorney, Steve Wolfson, leaves the door open for unchecked misconduct, potentially impacting not just individuals but the delicate balance of public safety.

Ripple Effects Ignored, Consequences Amplified:

Traffic violations, while seemingly small, can trigger a tsunami of consequences. Suspended licenses, hefty fines, and insurance hikes can spiral into economic hardship, job loss, and even family turmoil. In rare cases, overzealous enforcement without proper oversight can escalate into confrontations or even tragic accidents. The district attorney, with his broader perspective, can consider these potential consequences and make informed decisions about prosecution, minimizing collateral damage and prioritizing public safety. By abandoning this duty, they risk amplifying the ripple effects of minor infractions, turning them into major societal problems.

Courtroom Overreach, Justice Undermined:

In the vacuum left by the district attorney, Steve Wolfson's dereliction, the court has taken on the unlawful burden of prosecuting traffic infractions. This usurpation of power not only undermines the established legal framework but also raises concerns about fairness and accountability. Courts are not equipped to handle the intricacies of prosecution, potentially leading to errors, inconsistencies, and a further erosion of public trust in the judicial system. This overreach is not just improper; it's a recipe for injustice.

For over a year, the refusal to prosecute traffic violations has cast a long shadow on our justice system. Individuals stand unprotected, fairness hangs by a thread, and the very fabric of law is strained. It's time for the district attorney to remember his sworn duty and reclaim his rightful place in the pursuit of justice. Only then can we hope to navigate the twists and turns of traffic infractions with fairness, accountability, and a commitment to the greater good. Let us not allow this unlawful detour to become the new normal. Let us demand a return to justice, one traffic ticket at a time.

For Immediate Release

Judges Should Not Assume Facts

In a recent case, Traffic Commissioner David Brown assumed that a defendant was reading data on her phone because she was looking at the phone.

Las Vegas, Nevada — September 27, 2023 — Judges should not assume facts because it is unfair to the parties involved and undermines the integrity of the legal system. When a judge assumes facts, they are essentially making a decision without all of the evidence. This can lead to wrongful convictions or acquittals.

In a recent case, Traffic Commissioner David Brown assumed that a defendant was reading data on her phone because it was alleged that she was looking at it. This is a dangerous assumption to make, as there are many other reasons why someone might look at their phone. The judge made this assumption without any evidence to support it.

When the judge assumes these types of facts and finds the defendant guilty, the defendant may be wrongfully convicted. The defendant may also be denied the opportunity to present evidence to support her innocence.

Assuming facts also undermines the integrity of the legal system. When judges assume facts, they are essentially making decisions based on their own personal beliefs and biases, rather than on the evidence. This can lead to a loss of public trust in the judicial system.

We urge judges to always base their decisions on the evidence presented to them in court. Assuming facts is unfair to the parties involved and undermines the integrity of the legal system.
Joseph Maridon

Founded in 2009, The Maridon Law Firm is Southern Nevada’s leader in Traffic Citation defense.

To find out more, call 702-970-4224, or visit: https://www.lvtrafficticketguy.com/

For Immediate Release

Nevada State Bar Refuses to Pursue Matter Regarding Deputy District Attorney’s Alleged Misconduct

Following the Nevada Supreme Court’s Order (IN RE: DISCIPLINE OF JOSEPH MARIDON (June 20, 2023)) dismissing the State Bar’s Complaint against attorney Joseph Maridon, the State Bar of Nevada has refused to pursue a matter regarding alleged misconduct by attorney Austin Beaumont.

Las Vegas, Nevada — July 28, 2023 — The complaint, filed by attorney Joseph Maridon, alleges that Beaumont made a number of false statements of fact and law to a tribunal, disrupted a tribunal, and engaged in conduct that was prejudicial to the administration of justice.

The complaint specifically cites sixty-one false or misleading statements made by Beaumont in a March 8, 2022 Hearing in the Goodsprings Justice Court including:

  • He claimed that the waiver of his right to be present at trial was "utterly worthless" and "does not comport to any affidavit whatsoever." However, the waiver was submitted as an NRS 53.045 declaration pursuant to provisions of NRS 178.388(3) and was accepted by Judge Shupe as written and as signed by the defendant.
  • He claimed that the waiver was not signed by the defendant. However, the waiver was signed by the defendant, who was present on Bluejeans, under penalty of perjury.
  • He claimed that the defendant was not apprised of his right to be present at trial. However, the waiver states that the defendant was "fully aware of his constitutional right to be physically present at trial."
  • He claimed that the defendant was ordered to be physically present in court for trial. However, there was no order specifically requiring the defendant to be present in person.
  • He claimed that the defense is "willfully defying the Court's order" by not having the defendant present in person. However, there is no evidence to support this claim.
  • Beaumont claims that he is not seeking an advantage, but rather is "seeking to protect the integrity of this trial, to ensure that it holds up on appeal, because I'm certain that it will be. And I'm making sure that defendant's constitutional rights are protected." However, later in the hearing, Beaumont admits that he is not ready for trial and moves to continue the trial. This suggests that Beaumont's claims about protecting the integrity of the trial and ensuring that the defendant's constitutional rights are protected are not genuine. Rather, it appears that Beaumont is simply trying to delay the trial because he is not ready.

Beaumont's claims about the waiver of the defendant's right to be present at trial are false and misleading.

During the March 22, 2022 trial, Beaumont made additional false and misleading representations:

  • Beaumont falsely claims that the judge ordered the defendant's attorney to file an affidavit, signed by the defendant, waiving his right to appear for the trial. No such order was made.
  • Beaumont falsely claims that the defendant's counsel admitted on the record that he committed a felony.
  • Beaumont falsely claims that the trial was continued on March 8, 2022 because the defendant was not present. The trial was continued on March 8, 2022 because Beaumont was not ready, his witness was not present, and he moved to continue after the judge made it clear that the trial would commence that day.
  • Beaumont falsely claims that the judge ordered the defendant to file a notarized affidavit despite the fact that no such order was made.

These claims were blatant misrepresentations of the facts.

Beaumont has a history of making false and misleading claims. For example, Mr. Beaumont filed a pleading in the Searchlight Justice Courts that claimed that fines are assessed by police officers when they hand out traffic citations, as opposed to the court assessing fines upon a finding of guilt. Mr. Beaumont has also asked several non-law trained judges to order sanctions against Maridon without any basis in fact or law in numerous misdemeanor traffic citation cases.

According to its website, “The Office of Bar Counsel protects the public by educating and assisting lawyers to practice ethically and competently. Through its Boards, the office will discipline those lawyers who are found to have violated the Rules of Professional Conduct.” https://nvbar.org/for-lawyers/ethics-discipline/

In this case, the evidence is clear that Beaumont made numerous false statements and engaged in disruptive behavior. The State Bar’s decision not to pursue the matter is a disappointment.

I am still confident that the evidence shows that Beaumont engaged in misconduct.
Joseph Maridon

Founded in 2009, The Maridon Law Firm is Southern Nevada’s leader in Traffic Citation defense.

To find out more, call 702-970-4224, or visit: https://www.lvtrafficticketguy.com/

For Immediate Release

The Maridon Law Firm Announces the Goodsprings Justice Court has stopped assessing illegal collection fees.

Goodsprings Justice Court ends practice of assessing collection fees contrary to the language in NRS 176.064 and in violation of NRS 4.080.

Goodsprings Township, Clark County, NV— September 20, 2022 — Today, in an important victory that will benefit thousands of Defendants in the Goodsprings Justice Court, at a hearing in Case No. 21MCG005314, Justice of the Peace Larry Shupe granted a motion to vacate a collection fee that was assessed contrary to the language in NRS 176.064 in violation of NRS 4.080. Justice of the Peace Larry Shupe also stated that the practice of assessing such fees in other cases has officially ended.

Defendants should be aware, however, that not all collection fees were assessed in violation of the law. The court will continue to assess collection fees pursuant to statute in cases where a fine is due and remains unpaid at the time the fine is due. Furthermore, collection fees already assessed are still subject to collection. See, for example, Case. No. 19MCG007993.

The ruling comes after a more than two-year effort to bring the issue before the court. Joseph Maridon, Attorney at The Maridon Law Firm, observed: “We prevailed where so many others have failed.”

Founded in 2009, The Maridon Law Firm is Southern Nevada’s leader in Traffic Citation defense.

To find out more, call 702-970-4224, or visit: https://www.lvtrafficticketguy.com/

This matrix shows the current "standard" offers for cases in the Las Vegas Justice Court as of 12/20/2021.

The attached Order dated November 17, 2021 is regarding the hearing that was held on September 23, 2021.

Please know that we will continue our efforts to get every case resolved in the manner that is best for our clients.

If you are unable to see the preview of the PDF file on this page, you can download a copy of the file below.

The attached Open Records Act Request was submitted to the Office of the Nevada Attorney General on October 27, 2020.

Please take a moment to review this correspondence and let us know if you have any questions.

The attached letter was submitted to the State Public Charter School Authority for consideration during the October 2, 2020 board meeting.

Please take a moment to review this correspondence and let us know if you have any questions.

If you are unable to see the preview of the PDF file on this page, you can download a copy of the file below.

The attached letters were sent to the State Public Charter School Authority in an effort to ascertain the basis for requiring charter schools in Clark, Washoe and other counties to begin the school year with 100% distance learning when the Governor has allowed Casinos, bars and restaurants to resume nearly normal operation.

Please take a moment to review this correspondence and let us know if you have any questions.

The attached letter was sent to the judges that are responsible for suspending operations of the Traffic Division of the Las Vegas Justice Court.

Please take a moment to review this correspondence and let us know if you have any questions.

Page 1 of 3

The Maridon Law Firm

Attorneys and Counselors at Law.

Contact Info

  50 S. Jones Blvd., Suite 102, Las Vegas, NV 89107

 (702) 970-4224

Weekdays 8:30am to 5:00pm